Publications
 
Related Links
 
Useful Links
     
     
    For more information, please contact :
    info@grassrootsinstitute.net
     
     
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS
     
    Frequency: Quarterly
    ISSN Online: 2581-6853
    Language: English

     
     
    GRASSROOTS JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES

    has shifted to the new website. Please browse...

     
     
    GRASSROOTS JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES
     
     
     
    Become a Reviewer
     

    Manuscript reviewers are vital to the publication process, and as a reviewer you will gain valuable experience in scientific publishing. We invite you to become a reviewer of our journal. Some benefits of being a reviewer:

    • Being a reviewer opens doors to incredible opportunities. Review services will enhance your knowledge of professional standards; and quickly earn the respect of your peers.

    • The other potential benefit of being a reviewer is that you will be preferred considered to be an editorial board member.

    • The reviewers who need financial support could enjoy 25% discount to publish their articles in this journal.

    In order to provide a good review, a thoughtful and well-balanced report with suggested improvements for our authors, reviewers must be prepared to invest the necessary time to evaluate the manuscript thoroughly. If you are interested in being a reviewer for the journal, please join us by sending your letter to nr@grassrootsinstitute.net

    Please submit the following information along with your letter of interest:
    Full Name
    Full Address
    Affiliation
    Telephone
    Email
    Weblink
    Research Interests
    Brief Bio

    Reviewer Guidelines

    Grassroots Institute strives hard towards the spread of scientific knowledge, and the credibility of the published article completely depends upon effective peer reviewing process. Reviewing of manuscript is an important part in the process of publication. Reviewers are asked to make an evaluation and provide recommendations to ensure the scientific quality of the manuscript is on par with our standards. Reviewers are not expected to rewrite a paper. The reviewers are requested to provide authentic, positive review comments and critics for the respective manuscript. A reviewer has to review the articles received from the editorial office or the editor within the specifically mentioned timeline.

    • After receiving the invitation, reviewer is requested to intimate their availability to complete the review in given time.
    • Articles are assigned based on the research interests of the reviewer. They can approach the assigned editorial office, if the manuscript is beyond their expertise.
    • After assigning manuscript reviewer can contact the editorial office if there is any problem regarding time or conflict of interest, based on that the reviewer may extend the deadline or cancel the review assignment.
    • Reviewer should have a look at the assigned manuscript, whether the paper fits within the stated scope of the journal or not. Reviewers should not be biased or partial while reviewing the manuscript.
    • They should evaluate the manuscript within the provided timeline in order to facilitate timely completion of the review process.
    • During the review process, if you find that the article does not fit into the scope of interest, you may intimate the editorial office.
    • Reviewers are not entertained to discuss about the article with respective author(s).
    • We request reviewers not to use the information of the manuscript for their own use and to protect it from any sort of violation.
    • Criticism should be presented dispassionately and offensive remarks are not acceptable.
    • Confidential remarks to be done and you can advise the editor for acceptance, rejection or modification. Their comments and reviews must never be influenced by the race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, language, origin, gender or any political agencies.